do see installment two — on libby’s final
reply — i just posted it.
the full robbins russell firm pdf is here.
developing. . . but note that this is
just about all lawrence robbins could
muster in response to the c.i.p.a. § 6(c)
v. § 6(e) discussion. so — we may safely
assume he cannot cite any actual case
authority for the proposition that
§§ 6(a) or (c) cases should be treated as
§ 6(e) cases. . . game. set. match.
click to enlarge.
more soon. . .