it seems mr. schlozman will be “revising” portions of his june 5, 2007 testimony before the senate judiciary committee, for “inaccuracies“. that is a polite way of saying “he lied his face off” while under oath, testifying before senators leahy, feinstein, whitehouse and nadler, among many others. . . about his vote-supression efforts at the DoJ.
now, before my 2004-election-stint in the urban wards of milwaukee, and before the various DoJ scandals broke, i honestly would not have thought that new, criminal legislation — to protect against voter intimidation and voter mis-information would be needed, here in the new millennia — it is, after all, 2007, not 1957. . . but as the esteemed senator from the land of lincoln, and the city of big shoulders here reminds us — the next bradley schlozman [a protege of k-k-karl rove] or other loyal operative for alberto-gonzales-dick-cheney- george-bush waits in the wings — unless we make it more clearly a crime to do so:
it seems mr. schlozman will be “revising” portions of his june 5, 2007 testimony before the senate judiciary committee, for “inaccuracies“. that is a polite way of saying “he lied his face off” while under oath, testifying before senators leahy, feinstein, whitehouse and nadler, among many others. . . about his vote-supression efforts at the DoJ.
now, before my 2004-election-stint in the urban wards of milwaukee, and before the various DoJ scandals broke, i honestly would not have thought that new, criminal legislation — to protect against voter intimidation and voter mis-information would be needed, here in the new millennia — it is, after all, 2007, not 1957. . . but as the esteemed senator from the land of lincoln, and the city of big shoulders here reminds us — the next bradley schlozman [a protege of k-k-karl rove] or other loyal operative for alberto-gonzales-dick-cheney- george-bush waits in the wings — unless we make it more clearly a crime to do so:
it seems mr. schlozman will be “revising” portions of his june 5, 2007 testimony before the senate judiciary committee, for “inaccuracies“. that is a polite way of saying “he lied his face off” while under oath, testifying before senators leahy, feinstein, whitehouse and nadler, among many others. . . about his vote-supression efforts at the DoJ.
now, before my 2004-election-stint in the urban wards of milwaukee, and before the various DoJ scandals broke, i honestly would not have thought that new, criminal legislation — to protect against voter intimidation and voter mis-information would be needed, here in the new millennia — it is, after all, 2007, not 1957. . . but as the esteemed senator from the land of lincoln, and the city of big shoulders here reminds us — the next bradley schlozman [a protege of k-k-karl rove] or other loyal operative for alberto-gonzales-dick-cheney- george-bush waits in the wings — unless we make it more clearly a crime to do so:
it seems mr. schlozman will be “revising” portions of his june 5, 2007 testimony before the senate judiciary committee, for “inaccuracies“. that is a polite way of saying “he lied his face off” while under oath, testifying before senators leahy, feinstein, whitehouse and nadler, among many others. . . about his vote-supression efforts at the DoJ.
now, before my 2004-election-stint in the urban wards of milwaukee, and before the various DoJ scandals broke, i honestly would not have thought that new, criminal legislation — to protect against voter intimidation and voter mis-information would be needed, here in the new millennia — it is, after all, 2007, not 1957. . . but as the esteemed senator from the land of lincoln, and the city of big shoulders here reminds us — the next bradley schlozman [a protege of k-k-karl rove] or other loyal operative for alberto-gonzales-dick-cheney- george-bush waits in the wings — unless we make it more clearly a crime to do so:
it seems mr. schlozman will be “revising” portions of his june 5, 2007 testimony before the senate judiciary committee, for “inaccuracies“. that is a polite way of saying “he lied his face off” while under oath, testifying before senators leahy, feinstein, whitehouse and nadler, among many others. . . about his vote-supression efforts at the DoJ.
now, before my 2004-election-stint in the urban wards of milwaukee, and before the various DoJ scandals broke, i honestly would not have thought that new, criminal legislation — to protect against voter intimidation and voter mis-information would be needed, here in the new millennia — it is, after all, 2007, not 1957. . . but as the esteemed senator from the land of lincoln, and the city of big shoulders here reminds us — the next bradley schlozman [a protege of k-k-karl rove] or other loyal operative for alberto-gonzales-dick-cheney- george-bush waits in the wings — unless we make it more clearly a crime to do so:
it seems mr. schlozman will be “revising” portions of his june 5, 2007 testimony before the senate judiciary committee, for “inaccuracies“. that is a polite way of saying “he lied his face off” while under oath, testifying before senators leahy, feinstein, whitehouse and nadler, among many others. . . about his vote-supression efforts at the DoJ.
now, before my 2004-election-stint in the urban wards of milwaukee, and before the various DoJ scandals broke, i honestly would not have thought that new, criminal legislation — to protect against voter intimidation and voter mis-information would be needed, here in the new millennia — it is, after all, 2007, not 1957. . . but as the esteemed senator from the land of lincoln, and the city of big shoulders here reminds us — the next bradley schlozman [a protege of k-k-karl rove] or other loyal operative for alberto-gonzales-dick-cheney- george-bush waits in the wings — unless we make it more clearly a crime to do so:
it seems mr. schlozman will be “revising” portions of his june 5, 2007 testimony before the senate judiciary committee, for “inaccuracies“. that is a polite way of saying “he lied his face off” while under oath, testifying before senators leahy, feinstein, whitehouse and nadler, among many others. . . about his vote-supression efforts at the DoJ.
now, before my 2004-election-stint in the urban wards of milwaukee, and before the various DoJ scandals broke, i honestly would not have thought that new, criminal legislation — to protect against voter intimidation and voter mis-information would be needed, here in the new millennia — it is, after all, 2007, not 1957. . . but as the esteemed senator from the land of lincoln, and the city of big shoulders here reminds us — the next bradley schlozman [a protege of k-k-karl rove] or other loyal operative for alberto-gonzales-dick-cheney- george-bush waits in the wings — unless we make it more clearly a crime to do so:
it seems mr. schlozman will be “revising” portions of his june 5, 2007 testimony before the senate judiciary committee, for “inaccuracies“. that is a polite way of saying “he lied his face off” while under oath, testifying before senators leahy, feinstein, whitehouse and nadler, among many others. . . about his vote-supression efforts at the DoJ.
now, before my 2004-election-stint in the urban wards of milwaukee, and before the various DoJ scandals broke, i honestly would not have thought that new, criminal legislation — to protect against voter intimidation and voter mis-information would be needed, here in the new millennia — it is, after all, 2007, not 1957. . . but as the esteemed senator from the land of lincoln, and the city of big shoulders here reminds us — the next bradley schlozman [a protege of k-k-karl rove] or other loyal operative for alberto-gonzales-dick-cheney- george-bush waits in the wings — unless we make it more clearly a crime to do so:
it seems mr. schlozman will be “revising” portions of his june 5, 2007 testimony before the senate judiciary committee, for “inaccuracies“. that is a polite way of saying “he lied his face off” while under oath, testifying before senators leahy, feinstein, whitehouse and nadler, among many others. . . about his vote-supression efforts at the DoJ.
now, before my 2004-election-stint in the urban wards of milwaukee, and before the various DoJ scandals broke, i honestly would not have thought that new, criminal legislation — to protect against voter intimidation and voter mis-information would be needed, here in the new millennia — it is, after all, 2007, not 1957. . . but as the esteemed senator from the land of lincoln, and the city of big shoulders here reminds us — the next bradley schlozman [a protege of k-k-karl rove] or other loyal operative for alberto-gonzales-dick-cheney- george-bush waits in the wings — unless we make it more clearly a crime to do so:
it seems mr. schlozman will be
“revising” portions of his june 5, 2007
testimony before the senate judiciary
committee, for “inaccuracies“. that
is a polite way of saying “he lied his
face off” while under oath, testifying
before senators leahy, feinstein, whitehouse
and nadler, among many others. . . about
his vote-supression efforts at the DoJ.
now, before my 2004-election-stint in the
urban wards of milwaukee, and before the
various DoJ scandals broke, i honestly
would not have thought that new,
criminal legislation — to
protect against voter intimidation and
voter mis-information would be needed,
here in the new millennia — it is, after
all, 2007, not 1957. . . but as the
esteemed senator from the land of lincoln,
and the city of big shoulders here reminds
us — the next bradley schlozman
[a protege of k-k-karl rove] or other loyal
operative for alberto-gonzales-dick-cheney-
george-bush waits in the wings — unless we
make it more clearly a crime to do so:
